|
In Ruth Kelly’s letter of
thanks to Jim Rose, 30 November, for his interim report on
Synthetic Phonics, she writes, "I share your view that it
is now time to replace ‘Searchlights’. It was right for
its time when it was introduced in 1998." However,
British Synthetic Phonics expert, Alan Davies, Chartered
Educational Psychologist and Associate Fellow of the British
Psychological Society, strongly disagrees and believes that
they have been misguided and there is no need to look for a
new model of early reading to replace the ‘Searchlights’
model.
Davies says, "It is
madness to believe that you should start the literacy process
by first doing only phonics. There is much that can be done
before children start school, as I said live on Sky News
[11.10 AM 1 Dec], ‘The best thing they [parents] can do, if
they want to teach their child to be literate in English, is
to put a three-year-old child on their knee and turn over the
pages of a favourite book to anticipate the story and the
pictures’. It is wrong to believe that synthetic phonics is
the ‘best route to becoming skilled readers’, as stated in
Jim’s report. In my view, Ruth Kelly and Jim Rose have both
been misguided and Ruth Kelly has probably made the biggest
faux pas, by a Minister of Education, in British Educational
history."
Davies believes that the
British Government got it 100% right when they wrote in 1998,
‘All teachers know that pupils become successful readers by
learning to use a range of strategies to get at the meaning of
a text.’ He believes that the four ‘Searchlights’, used
by children to read the words and sentences in favourite
books, are all useful – even in early reading.
He believes that young
children should be encouraged, from the outset, to use four
main searchlights:
A ‘Word Recognition Searchlight’ – for words that are
recognised by sight (e.g. my, sea, tree).
A ‘Phonics Searchlight’ -
for hypotheses/guesses at the possible sounds for: the one-,
two-, three- and four-letter spelling choices of written
English (e.g. for the ‘g’, ‘ge’, ‘dge’ and ‘eigh’
in giant, cage, bridge and eight, respectively); other
sequences of letters, such as consonant blends (e.g. the two
sounds at the start of bridge, brick and brown); and syllables
(e.g. village, cabbage, cottage).
A ‘Context Searchlight’ -
for hypotheses/guesses based on the words, phrases, sentences
and stories acquired from essential speaking and listening
activities – including the ‘pretend reading’ of
sentences, paragraphs and pages in favourite books (e.g. On
Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and…….., he got up at
six o’clock.).
A ‘Grammar Searchlight’
– for hypotheses/guesses, which may be implicit or explicit,
about how words combine in a well-formed sentence (e.g. ‘he
six o’clock got up at’, if used above, would be ‘ungrammatical’).
Davies is the pioneer of the
widely used phonics programme THRASS (Teaching Handwriting
Reading And Spelling Skills), which is used in many schools in
the UK, but more extensively in Australia and, over the last
two years, Southern Africa. The Botswana Government aim to
implement THRASS in all primary and secondary schools and the
THRASS two-day training course is a compulsory module for
trainee teachers at the University of Witwatersrand,
Johannesburg and a growing number of other universities in
South Africa.
Davies has twice been invited
by OFSTED to present papers, relating to his concerns about
the teaching of phonics in the National Literacy Strategy (NLS).
In 1999, he proposed ‘A National Strategy To Train Teachers
To Accurately Articulate The 44 Phonemes Of Spoken English And
To Accurately Identify The Graphemes Of Written English’. In
2003, in ‘Why All Teachers Of English Should Be Trained To
Use The THRASS Periodic Table Of Phonics’ he berated the
British Government for promoting a 'Vowel Rap' that taught
infant and junior school pupils that there are only five
vowels sounds in English (when there are actually 20) and for
advising that trainee teachers should be taught to recognise
"spellings which omit the weaker elements of consonant
blends e.g. omitting ‘h’ from ‘thing’." When, as
he put it, "The ‘t’ ‘h’ is a consonant digraph
for the phoneme heard at the start of "thumb". There
is no ‘weak’ element to be omitted."
Davies explained, "The
previous NLS training for phonics work was weak and inaccurate
but it looks as though the British Government are going to
stay true to form with this sort of inaccurate advice. The
Interim Report, proof read by Jim Rose’s team of five
professors and an HMI, states that ‘Vowel digraphs comprise
two vowels which, together, make one sound e.g. ai, oo, ow.’
This is definitely not true. A vowel digraph can be any two
letters, which often include ‘consonant letters’, that
represent one of the 20 vowel sounds of English e.g. d-ay, k-ey,
teach-er, coll-ar, doct-or, f-er-n, sh-ir-t, w-or-m, f-ur,
sn-ow, t-oy, scr-ew, s-aw and c-ow – which, as a group, are
to be found in tens of thousands of basic English words."
To support his view that the
main problem with the NLS has been the weak and inaccurate
training for the ‘Phonics Searchlight’, Davies has
produced a video ‘20% Is Unacceptably High’, with the help
of a ‘Whistleblower NQT’ (Newly Qualified Teacher) and
many course evaluations from other NQTs e.g. "I’ve
learnt more from the training in these two days, about
phonics, than the three years that I’ve been at
university". Davies is a big fan of Synthetic Phonics but
his view is that THRASS is ‘The natural approach to
synthetic phonics’. He believes that the NLS has been a
success. "It is not that 20% of pupils are illiterate, it
is that 20% haven’t reached the preferred standard for their
age – Level 4. This significant improvement is attributable
to lots of hard work, by teachers and assistants, with texts,
sentences and words but the training for the 44 sounds and 120
key spelling-choices of English has been relatively
poor." he stated.
Davies added, "Jim Rose’s
view that it is a ‘futile debate’ to fully explore the
differences between the two main approaches to Synthetic
Phonics, what Ruth Kelly refers to as the ‘distracting
debates’, may appear futile and distracting to them but, I
can assure you, the differences have enormous implications for
the lives of hundreds of thousands of children in the UK, not
to mention the hundreds of thousands of children in
Africa."
David Cameron MP, prospective
leader of the Conservative Party, has written to Mr Davies to
request a meeting with himself and Nick Gibb MP, to clarify
the differences between the ‘Artificial Synthesis’
approach used in Clackmannanshire, Scotland, and the ‘Natural
Synthesis’ approach used in the THRASS programme.
See www.thrass.co.uk/nm.htm
Further
information
UK:
Mike Meade, Media Director, THRASS UK 01829 741413 Mob: 07970
151 738 mikemeade@thrass.co.uk
INTERNATIONAL:
Chris Griffiths, International Development, THRASS UK +30 266
203 1207 chrisgriffiths@thrass.co.uk
###
Return to TOP
|