There is no common agenda for building a literate nation
12 September 1997
Suddenly, literacy projects are the new panacea. Maureen
O'Connor offers a guide to some of the schemes which have made
an impact nationally and locally
In one sense at least the new Government's literacy
programme has already been an enormous success. Notions such
as the "literacy hour", classes for parents, summer
literacy schools and pressure to encourage parents to read to
their children for 20 minutes a day have guaranteed headlines
in newspapers from tabloid to broadsheet. Suddenly, raising
children's performance in reading and writing has become a
national objective that should be boosted by the National Year
of Reading in 1998/99.
From the experts' point of view , the issue is complex. As
the National Literacy Trust's book, Building a Literate
Nation, put it in July: "Literacy is a multi-faceted
subject that demands the attention of practitioners and
thinkers with very different perspectives. It is not,
therefore, surprising that there is no common agenda for
building a literate nation over the next five years."
What emerged from the book is a recognition that building
literacy requires co-operation between education, business and
industry, the community and the family. For teachers, the
immediate issue is a practical one. They are the ones who have
to meet David Blunkett's ambitious target for all 11-year-olds
to reach their chronological reading age when the national
curriculum test results are published in 2006. To do that they
need to find proven methods that will work for their children
in their classrooms in their communities.
Since literacy became a front-page issue, there has been an
explosion of schemes to raise standards. Some have proved more
controversial than others. This guide to literacy schemes and
projects is not definitive. Nor can it be qualitative; The
National Literacy Trust has 1,800 initiatives on its database.
Over the next three pages we offer a guide to a range of
schemes, both classroom-based and those that aim to work with
families and the community, so that teachers can see what is
available. They can decide what best suits their circumstances
and then make contact with experts who can offer more
information and advice.
The National Literacy Project
This is the project launched under the Conservative government
last year which has already piloted the "literacy
hour", now endorsed by the Labour Government's Literacy
Task Force. The project has already introduced its ideas to
300 primary schools and will be extended next year. Its
approach involves setting targets for children from the
reception class through to Year 6. The approach is unashamedly
pedagogical, which sometimes brings it into conflict with
heads and educationists who say that teachers do not need this
level of prescription. But the national director, John
Stannard, says that, in the pilot schools, prescription has
not been an issue. The project has shifted teachers' thinking
towards their pedagogy and they have tended to ask for more
help rather than less.
The project's approach is partly based on classroom
programmes developed in New Zealand by Dame Marie Clay and
others. The approach is structured, involving both whole-class
and group teaching, and tackles language at the level of text,
sentences and individual words. Vocabulary extension, word
play and grammar, phonics and spelling are all included, and
there are sessions using the techniques of shared and guided
reading. There is to be a national strategy for training and
it is anticipated that every school will be enabled to take
part in the project during the National Year of Reading in
1998/9. * The National Project for Literacy and Numeracy,
National Centre, London House, 59-65 London Road, Reading,
Berkshire RG1 4EW.Tel: 0118 952 7500......
THRASS
The acronym stands for Teaching Handwriting, Reading and
Spelling Skills. It is a highly structured scheme for teaching
the connections between sound and letter patterns based on
identification of the 44 phonemes (sounds that letters
represent, such as f or k) and the alternative graphemes
(combinations of letters, such as ph or ch) which can be used
to write them.
The terminology is made explicit from the start and the aim
is to ensure that children are not confused by being told one
thing and then finding in their reading something different:
a-pple, w-a-ter, a-che, for instance. The scheme makes use of
tapes and charts and also teaches regular letter formation
leading to cursive script. Detailed work on the effectiveness
of THRASS is under way.
THRASS, by Alan Davies and Denyse Ritchie, a Primary
Special Needs Pack, is published by Collins Educational, £70
Tel:…..
Back to TOP
TES
Index
Next Reference