Literacy existed before phonic manipulations
21 June 1996
Does the folly of the world of education know no bounds?
Last week I observed a new non-teaching assistant being
introduced to the philosophy and delivery of Skill Teach, a
structured, phonic reading programme written by Kath Shelton
and distributed by PAVIC Publications.
The new assistant was heard to remark at the end of her
introductory session: "I am amazed. It makes you think,
doesn't it? I had no idea there were so many rules concerning
the sounds and uses of letters. I didn't know it worked like
that."
In the same week, I saw Alan Davies on television
demonstrating his THRASS programme, the successor to Alpha to
Omega, Skill Teach, and so on, to student teachers. The
comments of one of the students, interviewed after Mr Davies's
session, were: "It is so simple. I didn't know this. Why
didn't someone tell me all this before about how the letters
work? It is so logical." (Although what is logical about
the transcription of "to", "so" and
"do" I have yet to discover.) When is someone going
to notice that, unless schools are now employing illiterates,
these comments are made by people who can read and write?
How
can they do that without knowing the phonic manipulations
analysed with such scientific zeal by Davies and Shelton?
Perhaps the Labour spokesman on education would like to
include a survey of his colleagues' knowledge of phonic rules
before he declares them to be the basis of five-year-olds'
learning to read (TES, May 31).
MAUREEN GUY
Huddersfield West Yorkshire
TES Index
Next Reference